Eighteen US states have filed a lawsuit against the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), its commissioners, and the SEC Chairman, Gary Gensler, for unconstitutional overreach and unfair persecution of the cryptocurrency industry.
This lawsuit puts into sharp focus a simmering tension between federal regulators and state governments about the proper scope of regulation in the digital asset space.
18 States Sue US SEC Over Crypto Regulation Overreach
Eighteen US states filed a suit against the Securities and Exchange Commission and its Chair, Gary Gensler, alleging unconstitutional overreach in its crypto regulatory practices.
According to FOX News, the states complained that the SEC’s aggressive enforcement strategy usurps their right to oversee local economic policies. The states further asserted that the actions taken by the agency have disrupted the emerging crypto industry, which is a significant role player in many state economies.
🚨SCOOP: 18 U.S. states have filed to sue the @SECGov and its commissioners, accusing them of unconstitutional overreach and unfair persecution of the #crypto industry under the leadership of agency chief @GaryGensler.
The lawsuit, signed by 18 Republican Attorneys General,… pic.twitter.com/wxOovuIRQH
— Eleanor Terrett (@EleanorTerrett) November 14, 2024
This lawsuit highlights growing tension between federal and state authorities over regulating digital assets in the United States. It also underscores discontent within the crypto sector about excessive and unclear federal interference, as noted by critics.
The plaintiffs include Kentucky, West Virginia, Iowa, Texas, Montana, Nebraska, Tennessee, Wyoming and others.
According to the legal complaint:
“The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has not respected this allocation of authority. Instead, without Congressional authorization, the SEC has sought to unilaterally wrest regulatory authority away from the States through an ongoing series of enforcement actions.”
Most notably, the lawsuit alleges that the SEC’s crusade against US-based cryptocurrency companies infringes on the principles of federalism because its actions go beyond constitutional boundaries. Specifically, Gensler argues that most cryptocurrencies constitute a security under the purview of the SEC but have failed to issue any formal rules classifying them.
Kentucky Attorney General Russell Coleman slammed the Biden Administration’s crypto crackdown on ordinary digital market participants as an attack. He joined a legal challenge with other conservative attorneys general, citing his battle to check federal overreach as part of the reason for doing so.
The complaint insists that the SEC’s actions violate states’ rights to regulate their respective economies and, as a result, violate principles of federalism and separation of powers. It alleges that the SEC’s far-reaching jurisdiction is sans congressional authorization, undermines state sovereignty, and attenuates innovation in the regulation of digital assets.
It also argues that applying antiquated federal securities laws to digital assets harms consumers by crowding out superior state-level protections that better suit the crypto market.
Gary Gensler Faces Resignation Rumors Amid Crypto Backlash
Rumors began to circulate that SEC Chair Gary Gensler could resign as early as tomorrow amidst growing criticism for his regulatory approach toward the cryptocurrency industry.
In prepared remarks for a legal conference last week, Gensler reiterated what he says is “significant investor harm” in the crypto market. He said “the vast majority” of cryptocurrency tokens are deficient in appropriate use cases, reinforcing his stance on strict enforcement.
Speculation that Gensler is on the verge of resigning has only increased since his speech, which included the following parting words: “I’ve been proud to serve with my colleagues at the SEC who, day in and day out, work to protect American families on the highways of finance.”
Former SEC official John Reed Stark has publicly called for SEC Chair Gary Gensler to resign, citing the need for a fresh approach to the agency’s cryptocurrency policy. Stark emphasized that ongoing investigations and regulatory initiatives targeting the crypto industry should be paused to allow for a smoother leadership transition.
Teuta Franjkovic
Teuta is a seasoned writer and editor with over 15 years of experience in macroeconomics, technology, and the cryptocurrency and blockchain industries.
Starting her career in 2005 as a lifestyle writer for Cosmopolitan, she expanded into covering business and economy for several esteemed publications like Forbes and Bloomberg.
Influenced by figures like Don and Alex Tapscott and Laura Shin, Teuta embraced the blockchain revolution, believing crypto to be one of humanity’s most crucial inventions.
Her fintech involvement began in 2014, focusing on crypto, blockchain, NFTs, and Web3. Known for her excellent teamwork and communication skills, Teuta holds a double MA in Political Science and Law.
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Leave a Reply